Wednesday, January 28, 2004
so im gonan have to say no to brad. abbey winters, though they are pasty and white, i mean c'mon. the peeing and the preggo porn= no good. plus, well i jsut aint feelin the looks of those girls. to me they look like the suicide girls but without the accesories (except ,pubic hair, which some of them have, in abundance).
as for other comments about the porn. yes we are very picky about porn and when you watch enough of it, you get to a point where you get pretty critical. i have not personally seen "inside" suicide girls but thats not important. most women in porn are not that attractive in the face. luckily i dont spend a lot fo time concerned with their faces. though a good face (like tera patrick) is always a plus. and the stereotype of men liking big plastic boobs has got to go. big plastic boobs are gross. i dont mind fake boobs of theyre done right- the key, for me, is that the transition form boob to body be smooth and look natural, not where there is a drastic outcroppin of boobage. now no job is ever perfect in this respect so somewhere in the middle is all i ask. and sometimes the fakies are superior to realsies becasue most natural porn boobs are nearing the knees of the women who carry them, making doggy style very not cool, becasue hteir boobs are hitting the sheets. as for not being appreciative of women willing to take their clothes off "for us" i am very appreciative, in fact a lot fo the turn on is the attitude of the women, not necessarily that they look like a perfect 10. they gotta look like they love what theyre doing. otherwise, its kinda lame. lampy, i mean. i guess.
as for holding women up to incredibly high stansards, this is true kinda. but first i would liek to say that women complain about htis often (not all women) and i think its rediculous becasue women hold men to standars jsut as high, they are jsut not as vocal about it. at least we are honest. also this observation about men is only slightly true, becaue although we may observe and comment, and critique at a high standard, we will fuck almost anyhting that moves, and i think, that when it comes down to finding mates adn such we know we cant have such high standards (as LADDER THEORY TELLS US!!!!!!!!!!) and we dont pretent like we do, and we are very attracted to women of not so a high a standard.
marie, i know you think its a bunch of crap, but i think that people that dont agree with the ladder theory, which some have postulated may infact be the unifying theory of the universe, are:
a) women
b) lying to themselves because they have some made for tv movie concept of how love works but in reality its all about the ladder
c) some combination of a and b
so to sum up: there are two important levels of attractiveness for men: hot and fuckable. since most women are the latter, and we all know that, we comment about the former, which may make us seem liek we have lofty goals, but its really jsut the next level, which happens to be way higher than the first
i do like this musterflowback of blogs, though i dont get why it is not non-HM (or MC) for marie. did i miss somehting. i mean shes musterflowing with us all. and the g-ride has put her 7.2 cents in here and there, and katie woo has crapped a big ball up an around this webspace. booby needs to get on the ball, pick it up and give it to his sister, so that i hwill have one more way to waste time.
....though its nto as if 15 gigs of porn wont keep me busy- yes i do love the stuff.
as for other comments about the porn. yes we are very picky about porn and when you watch enough of it, you get to a point where you get pretty critical. i have not personally seen "inside" suicide girls but thats not important. most women in porn are not that attractive in the face. luckily i dont spend a lot fo time concerned with their faces. though a good face (like tera patrick) is always a plus. and the stereotype of men liking big plastic boobs has got to go. big plastic boobs are gross. i dont mind fake boobs of theyre done right- the key, for me, is that the transition form boob to body be smooth and look natural, not where there is a drastic outcroppin of boobage. now no job is ever perfect in this respect so somewhere in the middle is all i ask. and sometimes the fakies are superior to realsies becasue most natural porn boobs are nearing the knees of the women who carry them, making doggy style very not cool, becasue hteir boobs are hitting the sheets. as for not being appreciative of women willing to take their clothes off "for us" i am very appreciative, in fact a lot fo the turn on is the attitude of the women, not necessarily that they look like a perfect 10. they gotta look like they love what theyre doing. otherwise, its kinda lame. lampy, i mean. i guess.
as for holding women up to incredibly high stansards, this is true kinda. but first i would liek to say that women complain about htis often (not all women) and i think its rediculous becasue women hold men to standars jsut as high, they are jsut not as vocal about it. at least we are honest. also this observation about men is only slightly true, becaue although we may observe and comment, and critique at a high standard, we will fuck almost anyhting that moves, and i think, that when it comes down to finding mates adn such we know we cant have such high standards (as LADDER THEORY TELLS US!!!!!!!!!!) and we dont pretent like we do, and we are very attracted to women of not so a high a standard.
marie, i know you think its a bunch of crap, but i think that people that dont agree with the ladder theory, which some have postulated may infact be the unifying theory of the universe, are:
a) women
b) lying to themselves because they have some made for tv movie concept of how love works but in reality its all about the ladder
c) some combination of a and b
so to sum up: there are two important levels of attractiveness for men: hot and fuckable. since most women are the latter, and we all know that, we comment about the former, which may make us seem liek we have lofty goals, but its really jsut the next level, which happens to be way higher than the first
i do like this musterflowback of blogs, though i dont get why it is not non-HM (or MC) for marie. did i miss somehting. i mean shes musterflowing with us all. and the g-ride has put her 7.2 cents in here and there, and katie woo has crapped a big ball up an around this webspace. booby needs to get on the ball, pick it up and give it to his sister, so that i hwill have one more way to waste time.
....though its nto as if 15 gigs of porn wont keep me busy- yes i do love the stuff.
Comments:
Post a Comment
